Recently, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences released a survey, more than half of the country's farmers wants the state to land acquisition, the only requirement is a reasonable compensation.
Why do farmers look forward to land? Two years ago, an illegal land acquisition news today makes it difficult to forget: a work in Shanghai, Henan Lingbao membership guy, reflected in the online home for the illegal acquisition of land by the local who were wanted, the matter was revealed, the local suspension of industrial projects, to be returned to the levy of the land the farmers, the young man has also been released.
but this guy talking about something difficult for outsiders to understand it: he who has not been home as heroes, but are afraid to return home, the family would not continue to stay at home, and not because local government to bring him how, but those who are no longer the land expropriated villagers are angry, that he engaged in industrial projects, yellow, and to not sign the original promise of compensation money is gone, and the corresponding post-industrial projects launched to bring jobs and the corresponding value of real estate, business opportunities, etc. are gone.
So, looking forward to land expropriation is not the case ps by paul smith, should be the voice of the vast majority of farmers. The main reasons are:
rent one of China's huge rural-urban income gap. The same piece of land, if engaged in agricultural production, especially if engaged in the cultivation of grain a year, net income of several hundred dollars per acre, and sometimes even negative, and an acre of land used to grain income to hundreds of times higher than the first times still, even dozens of times.
I once calculated that an account: an acre of land within Beijing's Fourth Ring, wheat and By land, the arable land into industrial sites, worth double immediately, even if the share of the small number of farmers, but also engaged in agricultural production than the multiples of earnings and strong.
Second, land acquisition and resettlement riches myth. In recent years, because there is more vicious demolition of the accident, the maintenance of stability under pressure, in many areas to compensate for land acquisition at market start, there have been many demolition riches myth, which is a great temptation to the farmers.
especially Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and other cities suburbs, through the demolition of hundreds of million or even ten million yuan compensation for farmers, not the minority. Land acquisition and relocation benefits, the number of generations than the farmers engaged in agricultural production revenues put together several times higher. Through the demolition of land, farmers not only riches, but also housing, social security, work paul smith shirts, etc. can basically solve, than a strong agricultural production.
Sun Yat-sen's phrase
third is a huge gap between urban and rural public goods services. After the expropriation of rural land, whether built or to engage in industrial and urban roads, generally for large infrastructure investment and construction, was bound to levy local infrastructure to bring a big change. After land acquisition, infrastructure enjoyed by other public services, and land a lot higher than before, the farmers will certainly be happy.
of course, not all farmers are willing to levy land. Want to be imposed, in general, should be his land for a high value-added farming, planting or construction, the number of compensation for expropriated after his current income than less, he will not agree.
In short, due to the huge existing workers and peasants of land rent scissors (referring to industrial and agricultural products exchange, the price is higher than the value of industrial, agricultural prices lower than the value of the shortfall), and the huge urban-rural income gap, the farmers get the land has been expropriated after the relocation compensation, the resulting urban housing, social security, work, etc., he continued to engage in agricultural production than several times higher. This premise is not resolved, the farmers will be looking forward to the land has been expropriated.
of farmers and local government paul smith dog collar, the land is big and good for them, farmers will be several times the income of agricultural production, local governments can get by selling to a huge land finance.
but the national interest is concerned, will be a major event. If the land is take out industrial, and national food security will be a big problem, on the overall economy and national stability would be a mortal blow.
so at the national level through various systems to constrain the behavior of local government land, to avoid too much too fast of agricultural land has been requisitioned to ensure national food security, but it has been hard to detect.
how to solve this dilemma?
fact, the most fundamental way to eliminate excessive or should the income gap between workers and peasants and urban-rural gap. Developed countries generally by reducing the number of peasants, farmers increased grain size and the huge compensation, the income gap between urban and rural residents was essentially flat.
Japan, South Korea is also compensated by the huge farmers and the high price of food, farming and enable farmers to engage in industry, services and other industries income almost.
present, China has reached 3.6 times the income gap between workers and peasants, the gap between urban and rural public goods services is more than a few times. Only the gap is resolved, the farmers will not look forward to the land acquisition. (Zheng Feng Tian (microblogging) by the Chinese People's University Professor of Agriculture and Rural Development)
No comments:
Post a Comment